Temporomandibular disorders in 19-year-old Korean men.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and the nature of the relationships between 3 temporomandibular joint disease (TMD) symptoms and symptoms of associated structures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was designed to rule out the effect from the uneven composition of the samples on TMD symptoms. The samples were collected from subjects who were of the same age, gender, district, and race. Nineteen-year old men (n = 27,978) were selected and investigated by means of questionnaires and clinical examinations. The prevalence of each symptom was studied and tried to determine the effects of the TMD-associated signs on the TMD signs. The indices allocated to reflect the TMD signs and symptoms and the others were dichotomized for bivariate analysis. The predictor variables were headache, neck pain, referred pain, stress, past trauma history in the TMJ, past TMJ dislocation, bruxism, and clenching. The outcome variables were mouth opening limitation, TMJ pain on rest, and TMJ pain during function. RESULTS: The incidence of masticatory muscle stiffness was 17.8%; TMJ sounds, 14.3%; headache, 7.2%; neck pain, 13.5%; bruxism, 8.4%; and clenching, 9.9%. Stress occurred in 12.8%, past trauma history in 11%, and previous joint dislocation in 2.5%. The experience of dislocation in the TMJ was found to be the most important risk factor in terms of mouth opening limitation (odds ratio, 4.08, P <.0001), joint pain during function (odds ratio, 5.50, P <.0001), and joint pain in the rest state (odds ratio, 4.63, P <.0001). Referred pain and the experience of trauma in TMJ were the secondary risk factors in terms of joint pain and referred pain and the stress in terms of mouth opening limitation. Considering referred pain can be induced by TMD, stress may be more related to mouth opening limitation (odds ratio, 2.18, P <.0001), and the experience of trauma in TMJ may be more related to pain in the rest state (odds ratio, 2.56, P <.0001) and during function (odds ratio, 2.47, P <.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of TMD signs and symptoms as determined by this examination was in accord with the findings in women or mixed samples of other workers. Prior experience of a dislocated disc was found to be the most risky factor in TMD. Stress was related to limitations of mouth opening, and the experience of trauma in the TMJ was found to be related to pain in the joint region. Bruxism may not be a direct risk factor in TMD, and the clenching habit found to be more harmful than bruxism.

Long-term results of different condylotomy designs for the management of temporomandibular joint disorders.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term results of the condylotomy techniques. STUDY DESIGN: Twenty-two patients (mean age, 20.8 years; occlusion: Class I in Angle's classification of malocclusion) were studied. All showed Wilkes stage II or early stage III. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), maximum mouth opening (MMO), and the positional change of the condylar segment were recorded preoperatively and postoperatively. The difference in each criterion according to the operative techniques was evaluated by means of a 1-way analysis of variance, and the difference between the preoperative value and the value in the long-term follow-up was evaluated by means of a paired t test. RESULTS: Six patients underwent an extraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (EVRO), 6 patients underwent a sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO), and 10 patients underwent an intraoral vertico-sagittal split ramus osteotomy (IVSRO). The preoperative value of the maximum mouth opening (MMO) was 33.0 +/- 8.3 mm, 46.1 +/- 7.0 mm, or 40.0 +/- 7.4 mm for patients undergoing EVRO, IVSRO, or SSRO, respectively. In the long-term follow-up period, the MMO was 49.3 +/- 14.6 mm, 47.3 +/- 3.2 mm, or 48.7 +/- 5.1 mm for patients undergoing EVRO, IVSRO, or SSRO, respectively. There were no differences in the amount of the MMO among the operative techniques (P >.05). The preoperative VAS in the operated-on joints was 3.9 +/- 2.4, 5.0 +/- 1.6, or 4.7 +/- 1.4 for patients undergoing EVRO, IVSRO, or SSRO, respectively. In the long-term follow-up period, it was 1.4 +/- 2.2, 2.5 plus minus 2.0, or 3.7 +/- 1.7 for patients undergoing EVRO, IVSRO, or SSRO, respectively. There were no differences in the VAS among the operative techniques (P >.05). When each measurement preoperation was compared with the long-term follow-up, the difference was statistically significant (P =.018 in the MMO, P =.004 in the VAS). CONCLUSION: The curative effect of a condylotomy on the internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint was acceptable in the long-term follow-up, but the osteotomy procedure used may be only a minor contributing factor to the long-term results.